This Is What Different Fingers Length Reveals About Your Personality! - RiseEarth

This Is What Different Fingers Length Reveals About Your Personality!


Did you know that the length of your fingers can reveal something about your personality!? Compare the length of the index finger and ring finger and see if it matches with some of your characteristics.

The image shows three types of finger lengths, marked A, B and C. Check your fingers and discover the meaning below.


A) They say that people in which the ring finger is longer than the index finger are very beautiful in appearance. They radiate with charm that others find irresistible. In addition, they are more aggressive and decisive and it is no problem for them to take a risk. The profession they usually have is: soldier, engineer, chess player and they are also successful in solving crosswords. Scientists have discovered that people with longer ring fingers earn more than people with shorter ring fingers.

B) People with shorter ring fingers than the index fingers have a great deal of self-confidence, they are full of them self and arrogant. They enjoy solitude and do not like to be disturbed in their free time. They are not the type of person who will take the first step when it comes to relationships, but they always accept and appreciate the attention they receive.

C) Persons in which the length of the ring finger and index finger are the same are peace loving, and feel uncomfortable when they find themselves in a conflict. They are well organized and try to get along with everybody. They are characterized by the fact that they tend to be faithful in a relationship, full of tenderness and caring toward their partners.

Source: healthylifetricks


FREE subscription to Receive Quality Stories Straight in your Inbox!

7 comments:

  1. I am more like acombination of the three types. ^_^

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is complete BS.
    At least correct your grammar if you want self-respecting viewers to actually take your website's pseudoscience seriously.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. I'm not being mean, but the whole thing seems to have been written as a joke.

      Delete
  3. (A) Who ever heard of a career as a chess player? (B) Wow…..they are full of them self? Your grammar needs to be gooder. (C) How can a person be characterized by the “fact” that they “tend” to be something? Doesn’t tending towards a behavior negate the notion that it’s a fact to begin with? I’m no troll but this so-called article needs some serious work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You do know gooder isn't the word to use here either. You might want to use the right grammer before you decide to make a post to this stating their grammer is wrong.

      Delete